https://www.slab.org.uk/guidance/the-effective-participation-test/
This page provides guidance on the ‘effective participation’ test in ABWOR. It sets out the regulatory factors considered in ‘effective participation’ and how they are assessed. These include the complexity of the case; the nature of the legal issues involved; the ability of the person to consider or challenge documents or information, and to present their views in an effective manner. It also provides information on the availability of ABWOR where the client is not present.
In terms of regulation 13 (3A) of The Advice and Assistance (Assistance by Way of Representation) (Scotland) Regulations 2003 we can only approve the provision of ABWOR for attendance at a children’s hearing where we are satisfied that the legal representation is required to allow the child, the relevant person or individual to effectively participate in the hearing.
There are four regulatory factors set out in regulation 14 of the 2003 Regulations to allow us to ensure that the effective participation test has been met. These factors must be taken into account by you and us in deciding if representation is needed to effectively participate. These factors do not exclude you or us from taking other factors into account. We need to be satisfied that there are reasons for your client to get representation at a hearing taking into consideration the ethos of the hearing system and its relatively informal and non-adversarial nature.
It is important to note that the 2003 regulations do not suggest that:
You, or we, must consider all the circumstances of the particular case.
If you grant ABWOR to your client on the basis of a non-regulatory factor then you must tell us about this in your ABWOR application.
You, or we, must take into account the following factors:
Your ABWOR application must address whether any of these factors apply in the case that makes it appropriate for you, as a solicitor, to be the one who provides legal representation to the applicant.
You should address:
A complex case may involve:
You must consider whether the children’s hearing or pre-hearing panelais:
We will not, generally, conclude that the following facts alone will satisfy us that the case is complex:
If you wish to rely on this factor, in support of your ABWOR application you will require to:
The legal issues may include:
If you want to rely on this factor, you should note that it is not at all unusual for fairly lengthy social work reports, for example, to be placed before a children’s hearing. This fact alone will not mean this factor is satisfied.
If you want to rely on this factor in support of your ABWOR application you should:
It is key that there has to be an issue which is such that your client needs legal representation.
Assistance by Way of Representation for children’s proceedings
Find out when a templated increase in expenditure is available under ABWOR for 2011 Act cases including what work it covers.
Assistance by Way of Representation for children’s proceedings
Find out about the availability of ABWOR to relevant persons and deemed relevant persons in various 2011 Act proceedings, and who applies the mean/merits tests.
Assistance by Way of Representation for children’s proceedings
Section 25 of the Children (Scotland) Act 2020 introduces rights of participation (‘participation rights’) in children’s hearings for certain individuals
Assistance by Way of Representation for children’s proceedings
This page includes information on when you need to apply for a fresh grant of ABWOR, and when you can continue to provide ABWOR for a hearing under an existing grant. It also sets out our position on whether fresh applications are needed for eighth working day hearings; interim compulsory supervision orders; and pre-Hearing panels.
Assistance by Way of Representation for children’s proceedings
View hypothetical examples of when you would make a fresh grant or application for ABWOR or where an increase request is sufficient for the next hearing.