https://www.slab.org.uk/guidance/adults-with-incapacity-awi/
Applications for civil legal aid to raise proceedings for welfare and/or financial guardianship should be submitted in the name of the proposed guardian, or the party who is opposing the order.
Each person applying to become a joint guardian needs to submit their own application for legal aid, unless proceedings are only for one guardian to be appointed with a substitute guardian also named. The only exception to this is if the substitute guardian is also raising proceedings in their own name.
You need to apply for a guardianship order prior to a young adult’s sixteenth birthday. Reports should be obtained at a suitable stage so that there is no risk of them time barring.
Legal aid is available to oppose another person’s guardianship proceedings and raise your own guardianship order. Here, two applications would be needed – one to oppose the proceedings and one for your own minute. However, you will only need to make one application if the court is willing to accept a “counterclaim”. Your client should mention this in your statutory statement if this is the case.
See also 'Streamline procedure' below
An application for legal aid to pursue guardianship should be accompanied by a statement from your client giving details of:
A brief statement of one or two pages will usually suffice.
The court will only appoint a guardian if this is the least restrictive option available. We would expect your client to have considered all other available options, including:
More information about the options available can be obtained from the website of the Office of the Public Guardian for Scotland.
Additional support for the application could come from:
If you client wishes to oppose a guardianship order they should provide:
Your client should include as much information as possible to explain why they are opposing the order.
If your client also seeks to counterclaim then information should be provided, to explain why the order sought is appropriate.
This could be:
We have been told that the objection period can cause difficulties for solicitors, particularly in more complex legal aid application, such as those submitted on behalf of an adult who is the subject of the proceedings.
If the objection period is going to cause difficulties for you in conducting the proceedings, then you may ask us to dispense with, or postpone, intimation of an application to an opponent.
You do this by noting “not to be intimated” in the first line of the opponent’s address, and omitting the opponent’s address from the application form.
You must also provide us with an explanation for dispensing with intimation.
You can do this using the free text box “reasons why there are no supporting documents” within the civ sol registration screen.
If the opponent is willing to consent to dispensing with the objection period, then an email from them confirming this should be provided with the application.
Please note that we can only agree to dispense with the objection period at the start of the application process, before the application has been placed under assessment and the intimation letters sent to the opponent. Once the objection period has been triggered, it requires to continue.
If your client wants legal aid to apply for a guardianship order under one of the sections mentioned below, then we have introduced a simplified application process in respect of the statements needed to support the application for civil legal aid.
The orders are:
These applications do not require assessment of the applicant’s financial eligibility, and use category code AISAW within the Civ Sol application which you submit on Legal Aid Online.
Please note that for all other types of legal aid applications relating to the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 our application requirements are unchanged and the usual supporting documentation is needed.
Option 1: We have devised a short AWI applicant information form which sets out all the information we need to make our decision. As long as the form provides the information requested in full then we will not require a statement by the applicant or their supporting witness. However, where the application seeks renewal of an order, a copy of the order to be renewed should be provided.
Option 2: Solicitors who wish to can use the form as a guide to help complete the applicant’s statement, which will need to include the answers to these questions. Where these questions are answered there is no need to include a statement by a supporting witness. Where you seek renewal of an order, a copy of the order to be renewed should be provided
The streamlined process is intended for applicants applying for unopposed guardianship orders. There is no need to include any opponents in such an application.
If you do include an unnecessary opponent then we have to intimate the legal aid application upon them, and hold the application for 14 days (the ‘objection period’) before we can take a decision.
This is why you should not include an ‘opponent’ unless they are formally opposing the court proceedings.
AWI case scenarios are increasingly complex. If your case does not fall into one of the straightforward scenarios listed for identifying the correct category code please read the guidance below about contacting us.
If you are looking to apply for or to oppose an order under only one of the following:
Then use category code:
If it is none of the above, then use category code:
We have found that there are increasingly more complex scenarios arising in these cases, particularly in cases where orders are in place, but changes are needed.
Occasionally a range of orders will be sought and, in such cases, it is the primary order you are seeking which determines the application of the legal aid regulations.
We understand that, depending on the court process being used, it can be difficult to work out whether a financial assessment will be required in terms of the regulations.
If your case does not fit exactly into any of the scenarios above, we recommend that you contact Wendy Dalgleish and Kim Blance with details of the case, and we will let you know which category code to use.
Please give details of the orders you seek, along with the relevant sections of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000, so that we can advise you how to proceed.
It would be helpful if you could do this as early as possible, as we may not be able to give a decision immediately.
You do not need to apply for prior approval (currently ‘sanction’ on LAOL) for the first set of statutory reports, which the court needs to make a decision. We understand that it can take some time for the required Mental Health Officer report to be obtained. It will often be appropriate to wait until the MHO has been appointed and their reports are completed, before instructing medical reports, to avoid them becoming out of date.
Our prior approval will be required to instruct any further reports if reports paid for by legal aid become time barred. We will meet the costs of these subsequent reports if you can show that reasonable steps were taken when instructing the reports to mitigate against this risk. If this happens, we prefer the same doctor is instructed to minimise the additional costs involved.
In some cases where your client seeks financial powers there may be a need for a report on the suitability of the proposed financial guardian, known as an AWI 8 report. Such a report is mandatory when the applicant seeks only financial powers. Where the report is mandatory you may instruct it without our prior approval, unless the cost exceeds £3000 in which case you need our prior approval to incur unusually large expenditure.
In cases where a report is not mandatory, the court may still request one. Where the court orders the report our prior approval is not needed, unless the cost exceeds £3,000, in which case our prior approval to incur unusually large expenditure is required. Please note that at the accounts stage you will need to provide a copy of Interlocutor / warrant from the court requesting an AWI(8) report to be obtained.
In all other cases you will need our prior approval to instruct an AWI 8 report.
Sanction is not needed to cover the fee of a safeguarder as long as you have a valid grant of legal aid in place when one is appointed.
Please note that we will only cover the safeguarder’s fee if the court orders the assisted person to meet that cost. You might need to increase your case cost limit if a safeguarder is appointed.
Where the assisted person has legal aid to apply for a guardianship order, then the cost of the initial Bond of Caution is included under the grant of legal aid.
You do not require our prior approval to meet this cost unless the premium exceeds £3,000, in which case you need our approval for unusually large expenditure.
If you have legal aid for a guardianship order and the proceeding become contested by any party you must amend the grant of legal aid to include the opponent’s details.
You will need to use the ‘amend’ application within Legal Aid Online to add the opponent.
You should upload the usual documentation to support the amendment application, namely, a statutory statement, statement of the applicant and a supporting witness commenting on the Answers, and a copy of the Answers themselves.
If the prospects of success change or there are significant developments that will alter our assessment you should provide a stage report so that we can decide whether the tests for legal aid are still met.
You are likely to need to apply for a case cost increase if a safeguarder is appointed, and the assisted person is found liable to meet the cost.
We are also likely to grant legal aid in cases where an individual wants to oppose guardianship because:
If the application is refused you can submit a review application.
We will always you to comply with any applicable Practice Note issued by the Sheriff Court.
Reports from non-treating professionals are paid between £100-£185 inclusive of all travel and mileage (excluding VAT). Reports from treating psychiatrists and the adult’s own GP are payable to an upper limit of £80 (inclusive of all charges) and do not require a detailed invoice. Anything claimed in excess of these figures requires a detailed breakdown of the work done.
A copy of the interlocutor requesting the report should be included with the account. If there is no interlocutor, you will need to include details from the Court confirming that the report was requested by the Sheriff. We will be unable to pay for the report without this.
We will meet the outlay for obtaining a land certificate to enable the land certificate number to be included in the summary application.
Where the property is not on the land register we will meet the outlay for obtaining a conveyancing search report for a proper description of the property to be narrated in the summary application.
The whereabouts of an immediate family member or other person likely to have an interest in an application may be unknown. Generally, the use of tracing agents is not necessary as the court may dispense with the need to effect service upon the individual based on the averments made in the Summary Application.
We understand that the draft summary application may need to be updated once all the required reports are returned. The Schedule 5, paragraph 4(a) sets out a framing charge per sheet of 250 words.
There are two different scenarios for charging:
Please see the Civil legal aid – detailed fees tables for specific fee rates.
The fee for framing each citation of a party includes the execution of the citation.
The citation fee at the current prescribed rate is chargeable for the following:
In addition to the prescribed fee for a citation you will be entitled a formal fee for signing the citation, as per Schedule 5, 5 (d) and a non-formal letter fee for serving the citation, as per Schedule 5, 4 (g).
No separate fee is payable for the Form 7 (certificate of citation) or Form 22 (certificate of delivery by manager). The framing of the citation includes the execution of service, as per the prescribed fee laid down in Schedule 5, 4 (b) each citation of a party, witness or haver including execution thereof citation fee.”
Although a fee for framing the Form 7 and Form 22 is not separately chargeable, you will be entitled to a fee for signing the execution of service, as per Schedule 5, 5 (d).
Service upon the adult and all interested parties should be done by first class recorded delivery post, chargeable at the non-formal letter fee, as per Schedule 5,4 (g).
We will only consider payment of Sheriff Officer fees if the postal service has been unsuccessful. You should explain in your account why this was necessary.
Sheriff Officers will be able to provide advice on the appropriate method of delivery if you need to make service abroad and the postal service is not an option.
Access to fund (Intromit with Funds) orders are obtained without recourse to court.
The process for appointment is usually an administrative one, for which the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) is responsible. It is, therefore, usually completely separate and not ancillary to the proceedings for guardianship.
The OPG does have the power to convene a hearing if objections are received to this. However, you do not need to be present at that hearing. Civil legal aid or ABWOR is not available for this purpose.
A diagnostic grant of advice and assistance may be appropriate to give initial advice on the process and to advise the client to contact the OPG or a CAB for assistance with the necessary paperwork. When assessing eligibility for advice and assistance it is the resources of the adult with incapacity that need to be taken into consideration.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for various types of cases involving disputes over children. The case types covered include: adoption and permanence orders; orders relating to parental rights and responsibilities; contact and residence orders; specific issue orders; minutes to vary; and minutes for failure to obtemper. Information is included for both pursuers and defenders.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for various types of cases in relation to matrimonial property disputes, including: division or sale actions and exclusion orders. It covers the supporting information you should provide with these types of application, and information for both pursuers and defenders.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for various types of divorce (or dissolution) cases without craves for financial provision. The case types covered include divorce based on one or two year separation; on grounds of adultery; and on the basis of interim gender recognition certificate. Information is included for defenders and pursuers. Information is also included for cross-actions and Court of Session cases.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for various types of divorce cases with financial provision. The case types covered include capital sum orders; transfer of property orders; earmarking orders; incidental orders in terms of section 14(2) of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985; and pension sharing orders. It covers the kinds of information we expect to see with these types of applications.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for various types of interdict (etc.) cases. Types of cases covered include: general interdicts (including non-molestation orders); matrimonial and domestic interdicts; breaches of interdict and power of arrest; non-harassment orders; and applications to revoke or vary orders. Information is included for both pursuers and defenders.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for various types of applications in relation to reparation actions. The case types covered include: road traffic accidents; accidents at work; industrial disease cases; professional negligence claims; and condensation/dampness claims. Evidential requirements are included alongside information for both pursuers and defenders where relevant.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits information for applications in relation to various types of appeal, and associated evidential requirements. The case types covered include: appeals against refusal of permission; licensing appeals; appeals to the UK Supreme Court; appeals against the First Tier and Upper Tribunals; appeals against the Social Security Commissioners, and information you should provide with your application.
Merits of different types of case
This page includes merits and other practical information for various types of action before the First Tier Tribunal for Scotland (Housing and Property Chamber). It includes the type of actions for which legal aid is available; operational guidance on how we consider these types of applications; and the evidence you should provide with your applications. The fees available are also included.