https://www.slab.org.uk/advice-agencies/scottish-national-standards-for-information-and-advice-partners/person-specification-quality-assurance-snsiap-moderation-committee/
A central part of the Scottish National Standards for Information and Advice Providers (SNSIAP) is the involvement of the Peer Review Moderation Committee, which monitors and supervises the peer review scheme on behalf of SLAB and Scottish Government.
Moderation of an agency’s peer review report by the Committee acts as the final stage in the peer review process. Successful sign-off by the Moderation Committee of an agency’s peer review report is required before an agency can apply for accreditation.
The SNSIAP cover three areas of advice, which are housing, money/debt, and welfare benefits.
The Moderation Committee is comprised of:
Further background information on the Committee is available here.
A Quality Assurance member:
The tasks for quality assurance members include:
Remuneration.
The work is unpaid, but all reasonable travelling and out-of-pocket expenses will be reimbursed.
Commitment.
The appointment covers a three year period, and an induction is provided. The time commitment to this post is likely to be one and a half days per quarter (including preparation time) and other occasional meetings as required.
Location of meetings.
The Committee meetings will usually take place online using MS Teams, and occasionally at SLAB’s office near Haymarket train station in Edinburgh.
Requirement for confidentiality.
It is of the utmost importance that committee members preserve the confidentiality of the peer review process. This includes taking responsibility for the handling of peer review reports as and when required.
The following details the skills, knowledge and personal qualities that are essential or desirable for the Quality Assurance members of the SNSIAP Peer Review Moderation Committee.
Please note that members of the judiciary, practising advocates and solicitors, and people who work in the advice sector or provide advice are not eligible for appointment as Quality Assurance members to the Committee.
Skills | Essential | Desirable |
Strong analytical skills. | Yes | |
Good interpersonal skills and the ability to communicate effectively with a wide range of people. | Yes | |
Able to appreciate different ways of working and approaches to delivering advice when assessing peer review reports. | Yes | |
Able and willing to work constructively as part of a team in a board or committee environment, with the confidence and independence of thought to challenge and test proposals or decisions made by the committee. | Yes | |
Able to interpret and evaluate substantial volumes of (often complex) information effectively. | Yes | |
Motivated to contribute to the continuous improvement goal of peer review and its development by offering constructive criticism about the process and identifying ways in which it can be improved. | Yes |
Knowledge | Essential | Desirable |
Knowledge and experience of quality assurance and peer review schemes. | Yes | |
A good understanding of the requirements of professional competence and able to evaluate professional standards. | Yes | |
Some knowledge and understanding of the advice sector in Scotland. | Yes |
Personal qualities | Essential | Desirable |
Committed to the ethos of public service. | Yes | |
Committed to the promotion of equality and diversity. | Yes |